In December, the state of Mississippi petitioned the Supreme Court to vacate roe v. Calf, The landmark decision that protects the right of a pregnant person to decide what to do with her body for the past 49 years. Disturbingly, for anyone who thinks the right should be preserved, the conservative judges’ comments during oral arguments implied“High enough!” “That they’re prepared to gut the decision. Brett kavanaugh indicated he was not concerned with the idea of precedence, which is very no what he said during his 2018 confirmation hearing. Samuel Alito compared abortion to racial segregation. Neil Gorsuch, among other conservative members of the court, implied Roe it had been badly decided. Amy coney barret He suggested Abortion does not need to be a legal right because women who do not want to have a child can simply carry it to term and put it up for adoption, without complications or problems. Clarence tomas has been trying to tear down roe v. calf during years.
In other words, conservatives at court believe that the government has the right to tell a person what to do with their own body. Which is extremely rich given its ruling on vaccine mandates on Thursday!
For The New York Times:
In your unsigned order blocking the mandate, the court wroteStrangely, although the risks associated with COVID-19 occur in many workplaces, “it is not an occupational risk in most.” He went on to add, also bizarrely, that OSHA should not be allowed to require coronavirus vaccines because you can catch the virus anywhere, not just in the workplace. “COVID-19 can and does spread at home, in schools, during sporting events, and anywhere else people gather. That kind of universal risk is no different from the everyday dangers everyone faces from crime, air pollution, or any number of communicable diseases, ”the order says. “Allowing OSHA to regulate the hazards of daily life, simply because most Americans have jobs and face those same hazards while working, would significantly expand OSHA’s regulatory authority without clear authorization from Congress.”
In their dissent, the three liberal court justices noted that the government must be able to counter “the unprecedented threat” currently facing American workers. On the decision of their conservative colleagues to get into the likelihood of someone contracting COVID at work, the judges basically answered, “Bitch, did we get lost that time you went to medical school?” writing: “Acting outside its jurisdiction and without legal basis, the Court displaces the sentences of government officials who have been given the responsibility of responding to health emergencies at work.”
In a small glimmer of positive news, the court did not to decide that the Biden administration may require that healthcare workers at facilities that receive federal money be vaccinated. But for non-health workers who may now have to work alongside colleagues who refuse to be vaccinated or Tested, apparently they are the breaks.
Kyrsten Sinema: Strengthening voting rights will divide the country
Because apparently it’s important … to spoil people who want to disenfranchise millions of Americans?
Former Trump secretary of commerce is totally interested in the miracle cure for fat loss doctor for the Pennsylvania Senate